MMR 2035FR

Hershey Company (HSY): analysis and signal as of September 2, 2026

Exchange : NYSE · Sector : Consumer Non-Durables

In short

The signal published on 02/09/2026 for Hershey Company (HSY) is weak, with a vote of 2/2 and a deterministic score of -0,50. No verified fundamental figure settles the case, and the US estate tax rule weighs on the rating.

Current signal
weak (vote 2/2)
Deterministic score
-0.5 → signal expected by the scale : weak (September 10, 2026)
Layers
fundamentals : neutral, risks : neutral

Triggered rules

RuleWeight
penalizes direct holding of US securities in a CTO (US estate tax at death), favors a UCITS ETF domiciled in IE-1.0
moderately favors an asset with robust operating profitability (RMW factor), cross-check with accounting quality (possible manipulation)+0.5

Thesis

Hershey holds a defensible competitive advantage and pricing power demonstrated during the cocoa shock. No verified fundamental figure, whether margins, public forecasts or valuation, settles the case, and the deterministic score remains negative at -0,50. The diversification contribution, measured by an overall volatility reduced by 13 %, is an argument for monitoring the file, without carrying firm conviction.

Bull case

The file values defensive consumption underpinned by a century-old brand, 47 consecutive years of dividend increases and price rises absorbed by demand in 2025-2026. Cocoa also benefits from an exemption from US customs tariffs. The diversification contribution is judged rare: an average correlation of 0,05, a quality exposure of +2,0 and a low-volatility contribution of +3,6 regarded as significant, for an overall volatility reduced by 13 %.

Bear case

The deterministic score comes out negative at -0,50, dominated by the US estate tax rule valued at -1,0 for a non-resident holder. No verifiable accounting data is available in real time, whether gross margin, BPA, net debt or the M-Score. The PFAS litigation is not publicly provisioned, the dual-class share structure limits the free float, and the price layer of the file remains silent, with no confirmed flow or technical configuration.

Scenarios

The base scenario, judged clearly the most probable, describes a sideways move until the third-quarter results due at the end of October 2026, with the dividend still paid. The bullish scenario assumes confirmation of the T3 gross margin and a normalisation of cocoa. The bearish scenario, the least probable, contemplates a maximum decline of -20 % in the share price if the T3 gross margin disappoints or if the PFAS trial turns against the company.

Risks

Invalidation reads in qualitative terms: a break of the 200-session moving average on an adjusted basis, confirmed by volumes, would weaken the thesis. On 02/09/2026, the adjusted price of 27,31 USD stood 16,7 % above that average and 10,2 % above the 50-session moving average. Further factors are the publicly unprovisioned PFAS litigation, the absence of verified accounting data and the US estate tax rule applicable to non-resident shareholders.

Market positioning (short sellers)

Short interest / shares outstanding
7.14 %
Days to cover
8.05
Settlement date
2026-08-14
Source
FINRA (disseminated on 2026-08-26)

Market information published by FINRA (consolidated short interest, all venues), no directional comment.

Upcoming catalysts

DateDescription
Résultats Q3 2026 et guidance FY26 révisée

Signal history (last 12 months)

DateSignalNew fact
weak (2/2)The adjusted price of 02/09/2026 stands at 27,31 USD, that is +10,2 % above the 50-session moving average and +16,7 % above the 200-session moving average. This market data point, subsequent to the verdict of 31/08, satisfies none of the three conditions retained: confirmation of the T3 BPA, the BCE decision and the evolution of cocoa. It only justifies an update of the reading on an adjusted basis. The layers flagged as potentially outdated do not constitute a new fact.
weak (single draw, outside the three-draw protocol)unchanged

Frequently asked questions

What does the signal of 02/09/2026 say about Hershey?

The analysis assigns a weak signal, validated by a vote of 2/2, with a deterministic score of -0,50. The main reason lies in the absence of verified fundamental figures, whether margins, public forecasts or valuation, and in a US estate tax penalty weighing on the score for a non-resident shareholder.

Which defensive strengths are recognised in the security?

Hershey shows a defensive consumption profile with a century-old brand, 47 consecutive years of dividend increases and price rises absorbed by demand in 2025-2026. Cocoa also benefits from an exemption from US customs tariffs. The average correlation of 0,05, the quality exposure of +2,0 and the low-volatility contribution of +3,6 document a diversification contribution, with an overall volatility reduced by 13 %.

Which elements weigh on the rating?

The deterministic score comes out at -0,50, dominated by the US estate tax rule valued at -1,0 for a non-resident holder. No verifiable accounting data is available, whether gross margin, BPA, net debt or the M-Score. The PFAS litigation is not publicly provisioned and the dual-class share structure limits the free float.

How is the invalidation of the thesis read?

It is read in a qualitative way, with no numerical level to reach. A break of the 200-session moving average on an adjusted basis, confirmed by volumes, would weaken the thesis. On 02/09/2026, the adjusted price of 27,31 USD traded 16,7 % above that average and 10,2 % above the 50-session moving average, which leaves room before such a signal.

What is there to know about the PFAS litigation?

The file mentions PFAS litigation not publicly provisioned, which prevents measuring its financial impact. An unfavourable outcome would be one of the triggers of the bearish scenario, alongside a disappointing third-quarter gross margin. The dual-class share structure and its limited free float also restrict liquidity and visibility on the security.

Sources

The official filings below are the issuer's own, matched to this stock by its identifier (LEI, CIK or ISIN). The figures quoted above come from an automated arbitration: they have not been re-checked one by one.

Automated AI analysis: limitations and transparency

  • This content is an automated analysis produced using artificial intelligence. Personal analysis for information purposes — no personalised investment advice. MMR content consists of general research. It does not take account of your financial circumstances, objectives or risk tolerance. Data, analyses and results, including those produced using artificial intelligence, may contain errors, be incomplete or become outdated. No return or outcome is guaranteed. All investments carry a risk of partial or total loss of capital. Past performance and simulations do not predict future results. Before making any decision, check information against original sources and, where necessary, consult an authorised professional. You remain responsible for your investment decisions. This notice does not exclude or limit any liability that cannot legally be excluded or limited.
  • Tool and analysis: QDNA, Aurélien Ambert.
  • Analysis (arbitration) completed on September 2, 2026; this page was completed on September 3, 2026 at 23:51 (UTC).
  • Interests: no position in the stock analysed (HSY) is recorded in the data consulted on (UTC). This does not confirm the absence of holdings or other interests. The situation at the analysis publication date has not been reconstructed.
  • This declaration covers only recorded positions in this stock; it is not an exhaustive verification of other interests or remuneration.
  • Methodology: analysis chain, score formula and scale described on the public methodology page.
  • Analysis horizon: 2035.

See also